Get 40% Off
💰 Ray Dalio just increased his holdings in Google by 162.61% - See the full portfolio with InvestingPro’s free Stock Ideas toolCopy Portfolios

Arizona Senate repeals 1864 abortion ban, governor seen signing quickly

Published 05/01/2024, 06:13 AM
Updated 05/03/2024, 12:16 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Democrat Stephanie Stahl Hamilton, sponsor of repeal bill of 1864 Arizona abortion law, speaks to reporters during a press conference in Phoenix, Arizona, U.S. April 17, 2024. REUTERS/Liliana Salgado/File Photo

By Brad Brooks

(Reuters) -The Arizona Senate voted on Wednesday to repeal the state's 1864 ban on abortion, which could otherwise have taken effect within weeks.

The repeal was passed by the Senate in a 16-14 vote and is expected to be quickly signed by Governor Katie Hobbs, a Democrat. Two Republican senators crossed party lines to vote in favor of repealing the ban.

The Arizona House last week passed the measure after a handful of Republicans broke party ranks and voted with Democrats to send it to the Senate.

"We're here to repeal a bad law," Senator Eva Burch, a Democrat, said from the floor. "I don't want us honoring laws about women, written during a time when women were forbidden from voting."

Republican Senator Wendy Rogers (NYSE:ROG) said in casting her vote to maintain the 1864 ban that repealing the law went against the conservative values of Arizona.

"Life starts at conception. They got it right in 1864. We need to continue to get it right in 2024," Rogers said.

The fight over the Civil War-era abortion ban in Arizona, a state sharply split between Democrats and Republicans, is the latest flashpoint on women's reproductive rights in the U.S. In 2022 the U.S. Supreme Court ended the constitutional right to abortion, leaving it up to states to decide the issue. Conservative-led states quickly invoked strict bans on abortion within their borders.

Democrats across the U.S., confident that public opinion is on their side in supporting abortion rights, have sought to elevate the issue ahead of November's presidential election. Arizona is a key battleground state.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Heather Williams, president of the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee that works to elect Democrats to state legislatures, said her party would capitalize on the "extreme nature of MAGA Arizona Republicans" who voted to maintain the 1864 law as Democrats try to flip the state's House and Senate in November's elections.

Rogers, the Republican state senator, acknowledged the political risks.

"Some colleagues would say it's politically pragmatic for us to find middle ground," she said. "We might lose the legislature, we might lose the presidential election. But it's more important to do what's right."

The 1864 law was revived by a state Supreme Court ruling on April 9, and unless the legislature intervened, it could have taken effect within 60 days of that ruling, state Attorney General Kris Mayes, a Democrat, has said.

Restrictions on abortion are still in place in Arizona. In 2022, the state legislature passed a law that bans abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy.

Arizona Democrats have said they will continue attempting to place a ballot measure before voters in November that would restore abortion rights.

Latest comments

More human sacrifices. Hooray
--nor shall any State deprive any person of life-- Me thinks that there are people commenting here that think that a baby is not a life. That must mean that a baby is a liberty?? Or are you murderers saying a baby is a property? Interesting, a baby as a property......consider why the 14th amendment was made in the first place. I'm pretty sure that the people for whom it was written did not like being considered as property.
Imagine that…a state decidng on a state law. Give it up for The Constitutiion! 👏
Imagine that, another magabilly who doesn't understand the Fourteenth Amendment.
Imagine that…another angry liberal resorting to name calling who thinks law is black and white and doesnt understand the role of the Supreme Court.
I think the USA should follow the Indian law on abortion and voting rights. it is the best bipartisan solution
Inida uses electronic voting machines in its elections for like 30 years now, can you imagine the howling from the MAGA crowd if that's implemented in US?
they also require photo ID, sounds like a sound idea
"extreme nature of MAGA Arizona Republicans" who voted to maintain the 1864 law -- even their Orange Messiah were calling for the repeal, I mean, how crazy do you have to be to make The Donald sounds moderate and reasonable in coparison???
they love abortion at reuters.lol
who wrote this?? a child. the supreme Court never ended the constitutional right to abortion. it was never a constitutional right. i say let Congress create a law allowing abortion up until 5 months. DEMS will never go for it because they lose lose a key issue critical to getting women to vote for them
Yes. It means state laws. Next.
so you agree brad, that it's a states right to decide
Row v Wade held that the Fourteenth amendment's guarantees of equal protection made state laws outlawing abortion unconstitutional.
*The Arizona House last week passed the measure after a handful of Republicans broke party ranks and voted with Democrats to send it to the Senate. * - it's pretty sad that these days there are fewer and fewer sane republicans left
wtf
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.